Iridient x transformer forum pro#
Iridient x transformer forum software#
Iridient x transformer forum license#
Iridient x transformer forum free#

ItвЂ™s not the first time IвЂ™ve made remarks about supporting recent OS beyond the current -1 recent policy. The same applies here but your remark might come a bit late if the release is just a few weeks away. I have no plans to wait until I try it - the day it appears, IвЂ™ll place my order. IвЂ™m curious if PL4 and PL5 will both be able to work on images after the new installation, or will my version of PL4 be removed when I update? вЂ¦not much more to say. I would prefer to do ALL my editing in PhotoLab, and ignore the other editors I had to buy to work with images that PhotoLab didnвЂ™t accept. I doubt it will happen, but I wish PL5 could open my Leica M8.2 files, even if it doesnвЂ™t do any automatic correcting.

Iridient x transformer forum free#

Assuming those here in charge have been reading this, maybe what Joanna wrote could be accessed for each tool somehow? DxO is free to use those images if it would help, as you would have the description, the before image, and the after image. Joanna has been constantly teaching me about using various features in PL4.

IвЂ™m finished with buying new Fuji cameras, as I prefer the standard way of controlling it, and dislike touch-screens.

Iridient x transformer forum license#

Small change from what you wrote, based on past experience, IвЂ™m sure I will buy the license for PL5 regardless, but I would very much like to be able to use it for my Fuji X100f files. WonвЂ™t be buying any upgrades until DxO can work with Fuji files. What I donвЂ™t understand about the Photolab Fuji approach is that when Photolab could easily support Fuji files demosaiced by Iridient X-Transformer, they donвЂ™t. I understand why DxO doesnвЂ™t want to deal with Trans-X sensors directly (conflicts with their processing algorithms, IвЂ™m sure DxO has done soime internal tests). Given the choice between Fuji cameras and Photolab, I chose Photolab. CanonвЂ™s video cripple hammer and poor mirrorless cameras (first round) succeeded in driving me away from the brand despite first class lenses. Tired of two sets of lenses and two sets of menus, moved completely to Nikon for sports and carry camera and video. I liked the cameras but I was so frustrated by not having Photolab to process my photos (RAW to Iridient Developer, jpegs to Photolab workflow didnвЂ™t work for me) that I gave up Fuji altogether.ДЄfter the poor ergonomics of a Sony A7 III (terrible for left eyed shooters with noses), tried a Nikon Z6 and liked both image quality (stills are similar but video highlight rolloff is much better with a Z6 than an A7 III) and ergonomics very much. Canon didnвЂ™t have anything outside of 1DX II with good video at that point nor mirrorless so I tried out Fuji for video and carry cameras. IвЂ™d started using DxO on my Canon sports photos and liked it very much. Interesting you took a different approach. IвЂ™ve just upgraded cameras to the Fuji X100V and X-Pro3 from my 2012 era Olympus OMD E-M5s

Iridient x transformer forum software#

YouвЂ™re French, foreign and will always be unloved in the Silicon Valley-centric software world. No matter what you do, Apple doesnвЂ™t care and Apple wonвЂ™t love you. Let me bring you up to date on what competitors system requirements are like on Mac:ДonвЂ™t narrow your market unnecessarily or drive your existing customers and fans away.ДЄpple does not pay DxO to promote its latest OS or sell its hardware. ThereвЂ™s a fair number of us who are both Photolab evangelists and running older OS (since when does a three year old OS quality as old or obsolete: Mojave was introduced in 2018). IвЂ™d evaluate my unpaid work promoting Photolab at between $2000 and $5000/year depending on the year. If Photolab 5 comes out and will not run on Mojave I an unlikely to buy or recommend Photolab to anyone for a few years before I eventually decide to move to Linux or buy a more recent Mac.

I have no plans to change these computers as they are the best Macs ever made and replacing them with the new Mac Pros would cost a minimum of в‚¬8500 and thatвЂ™s before the storage drama (apparently these Mac Pros wonвЂ™t accept normal SSD).

Iridient x transformer forum pro#

My main computers Mac Pro silver towers which cannot be upgraded past Mojave.

Iridient x-transformer forum